Initially, their states were all city-sized, but the western city-state and Chinese feudal states had different political structures. The lower class, or the plebeians, were represented by tribunes who were government officials that supported the poorer people.
This structure not only applied to the household, but to everyday life. The Romans and the Persians both conquered vast amounts of land. As a result, China could easily maintain control over these people because there were little to no differences between culture meaning not a lot for people to be upset about.
If all the fortified walls built in the different dynasties around northern China are included, the total length would exceed 31, miles. The classical societies of Rome and China can be contrasted in their different relationships between geography and culture.
A summary of the pre-imperial developments: Though Rome and China both had a stabilized central government, they had very different tolerances of other cultures. His reforms in Qin, beginning in BCE, not only brought Qin from an underdog to the major league of warring states, but also set the institutional foundation for imperial China.
Its main weapon was the chariot, which was monopolized by aristocrats. When it came to water like the Romans Chinese were controlling it like putty in their hands. This member was to be given total respect and obedience and made all the important decisions for the family.
Furthermore, Legalists issued regulations for government officers and meted out punishments for abuses, even to aristocrats and relatives.
The city-state government had no means to prevent ambitious generals from buying off the army by looted silver and the promise of land at retirement. Conscious of their contributions, the commons demanded a larger say in public affairs.
As gravity clearly shows, what goes up, must come down.
Due to this practice, many early Christians were punished because they would not worship the emperor as a god. Although these empires had vast differences, they both managed to have lasting effects on the world around them. Also, in Rome, the people had more power than the citizens of Han China.
Some slaves were soldiers who had been captured in wars, while others were the children of slave parents. The Mediterranean world was well into the Iron Age. These slaves were bought and sold in the slave markets.
Such is also true with the Han and Roman empires. It caught up during the Warring-states period, when Legalist reformers prepared the institutional foundations of the imperial China. Independent family forms emerged. China and Rome China and Rome were astonishing civilizations that managed to advance technology and civilations.
Both civilizations were rapidly growing and making changes to the world. Compare and Contrast Between Classical India and China Essay Words | 3 Pages. CAC between India and China When analyzing cultural traditions and innovations, economic relationships, and social classifications and expectations during/between the periods of classical China and classical India.
Start studying Differences and Similarities of the Roman and Chinese Empire. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. In contrast to the elegant aristocrats of feudal China, the senatorial aristocrats of the early Roman Republic were rustic and pragmatic.
They were farmer-soldiers like common citizens, as symbolized by Cincinnatus, patrician. - China’s cultural, Confucian bureaucracy - Rome’s principal philosophies of provided a core cultural identity paganism, Stoicism and, later, throughout the empire and beyond.
ˇ ˇ (!!˚ ˇ˝ ˆ˘ˇ - China’s cultural, Confucian bureaucracy - Rome’s principal philosophies of provided a core cultural identity paganism, Stoicism and, later.Compare and contrast china and rome